Welcome to Cold War Gamer, a blog I am using to record my Cold War wargaming projects. These range from fictitious Cold War hot projects to historical conflicts that took place around the globe throughout the Cold War era, all modelled and gamed in 20mm. The blog includes links to various resources useful to the Cold War Gamer.

My current projects include: Central Front; British & Soviet. South African Border War; Angolans and South Africans. Soviet Afghan War; Soviets and Afghans

Sunday, 11 March 2012

Elhiem Figures Cold War NATO Range




Matt from Elhiem Figuers recently published these excellent shots of his cold war infantry range on the Guild recently.




Elhiem German Range

The NATO range currently covers British, US , German and generic NATO. The figures are capable of portraying forces up to company level with the focuses on basic infantry, and light support weapons found within the platoon and company. The range will be expanded over the coming year to enable representation of the forces required by the scenarios in Ambush Alleys Cold War Hot Supplement for their Force on Force rule set.







Elhiem Generic NATO Range




The German and Generic NATO figures are suitable for Danish, Norwegian and German. They can cover a number of other NATO nations with some green stuff adaption of webbing or as is depending on taste, these would include Portuguese and Spanish. The Spanish in particular offer some interesting opportunities around head swaps with WW2 germans. The range also offers oppourtunities into the middle east for units that wore M1 helmets and carried G3s.





Whilst the G3 and FN FAL SLR were similar they are bizarly quite distinctive in there own right so Canadians, Dutch, Belgium and Greeks are more of a stretch but this depends on your taste, most of these armies also deployed the FN Mag GPMG whilst Matt's Generic NATO figures use the German MG3. In addition to the smaller NATO nations Matt also covers the US and British forces of this period. Using the British to represent some of the other minor FN FAL SLR and FN MAG equipped nations is difficult because of the distinctive appearance of the British webbing and Helmet. The US component of the range currently includes both flavours of US helmets. The M1 Helmeted guys are equipped with M16A1s and a M60 whilst the guys in the K pots have body armour, M16A2s and an M249.

Elhiem US Range


Elhiem British Range

All up a great looking range offering a degree of flexibility of use to represent a wide variety of Cold War forces, and some great painting by Matt. Its good to hear there are plans to extend the range. If I was asked what would add to the range I think I'd plum for the odd European beret and some heavier anti tank weapons including Milan as well as some M1 helmet, SLR and FN MAG equipped troops to round out the minor nations and offer scope for representation of African forces.

http://elhiemfigures.com
NATO Armies today, Osprey


Saturday, 10 March 2012

Review - Model 1/72, S&S BRDM 2 + AT5


The BRDM 2 has been the host for a variety of Anti Tank systems deployed by the Soviets since the 1970s.  In 1977 the Red Army started to deploy them equipped with either AT 4 or AT5 in a common mount.  The vehicle has a prominent sight unit in a circular rotating mount over the right hand crew position.  The Vehicle equiped Regimental Anti Tank Companies in Motor Rifle Regiments  and Divisional Anti Tank Battalions in Motor Rifle Divisions.  


Ace used to do a model of this vehicle but that is now discontinued, so there are very few options if you want to represent them in your army.  The S&S model is cast in Resin with few defects although the front light clusters had suffered on most of the vehicles I have received, these are easily rebuilt using filler.  The wheels are cast in resin and needed a bit of attention whilst the Turret and launcher are cast in white metal.


The S&S model uses the same BRDM 2 hull as the basic vehicle which therefore needs a bit more work in order to fully represent the Anti Tank variant of the vehicle.  To represent the sighting system, I filed away the right hand hatch and added a scratch built sight unit and cupola with a half moon hatch. The sight units on the side of the vehicle are not used on this version of the BRDM 2 so they were removed as well.  In addition I have added brass hand rails and used plasticard to represent the raised windscreen covers.





As they say on Blue Peter here are some I did earlier, these were built straight from the box without the amendment for the sight unit.


References:


Sunday, 4 March 2012

Wargames Unit - Soviet MRR, Air Defence Battery



The regimental air defence battery in the early 1980s consisted of 4 ZSU 23-4 and 4 SA 9 Gaskin, together with some command and supply vehicles.  At 1:3 this is represented by 1 ZSU 23-4 and 1 SA 9.






The ZSU 23-4 is the S&S version, a resin kit with white metal guns and radar. One of my favorite S&S kits and a great representation of the real thing.


The second vehicle in the battery is also from S&S and is the SA9 Gaskin which was used by BMP, BTR and tank units. It was replaced in BMP and Tank units in GSFG by the SA13 Gopher from 1980 having come into service around 1978. 


The open window visors on the SA 9s are made from thin plasti-card superglued in place.  The S&S  SA9 uses the standard BRDM 2 hull that shaun makes and an SA9 launcher which is produced in white metal.

ORBAT - 1980s Soviet MRR and TR, Part 2 Tank Change



In part 1 of this series of posts, the impact of location and orbat change on the composition of the MRR and TR were considered the next aspect of MRR and TR composition I wish to examine is the rate of equipment change that occurred within the force through out the 1980s. The principal drivers for change over this period would appear to be a doctrinal shift where conventional artillery replaced nuclear and a response to the increasing effectiveness and scale of the NATO anti armour defence.  From the mid 70s onwards this drove an increasing emphasis on the combined arms battle, greater amounts of artillery, more mobile artillery and increasing levels of protection for both armour and infantry, with greater integration of infantry and artillery into tank divisions and regiments.  One of the aspects of the cold war period that I find particularly interesting is how this pendulum of technological and organisational advantage swung backwards and forwards between the various NATO forces and the Soviet led Warsaw Pact forces.

 As ever major change took an amount of time to achieve and how it proceeded also had a significant impact on the potential force composition.  The rate of change in the fielding of new equipment was greatest in GSFG followed by the other forward groups of forces then the remainder of the Western TVD. A degree of experimentation took place in terms of force structure and equipment change in the Soviet Military districts within The Western TVD because they were more distant from prying Western eyes.  It is worth bearing in mind when considering the numbers of tanks of a type produced that there were around 300 tanks in a fully equiped soviet TD or MRD.




The CIA estimated annual tank production to be 3000 vehicles per year between 1973 -1983, and assessed that this was maintained despite the increasing sophistication of the armoured vehicles being produced over this and the subsequent periods. In broad terms the changes that occurred were as follows:
  • Between 1976 and 1980 In GSFG the T 64 replaced T54/55 tanks in 2nd Guards Tank Army, 20th Guards Army and 3rd Shock Army
  • From 1980 the T64 was introduced in the SGSF
  • From 1981 in GSFG the T64 was upgraded from T64 to T64B with the earliest completion date estimated as 1986.  
  • Between 1981 and 1985, in GSFG the T62 fleet in1st Guards Tank Army and 8th Guards Army converted to T 80B
  • by 1990 some 600 T80BVs had been deployed and 4000 T80s converting 6 Tank and 6 Motor Rifle Divisions in GSFG and 1 tank and 1 Motor Rifle Division in NGSF.
  • From 1984 T64 were deployed with ERA
  • From 1974 in CGSF and the Western Military districts of the Soviet Union T54/55/62 fleet was replaced by T72 it is assumed these were upgraded to T72A from 1980 and T -72B from 1985, I have assumed that subsequent upgrades flowed out in line with the equipment upgrades as I can find no reference to the actual change programme.
The CIA assessment provides a view that in 1983 50% of the Soviet tank force in the Western TVD were T64/72/80 by 1985 this would be 75% and by 1990 100%. By contrast for the Nortwestern TVD the ratio of Modern tanks in 84 was assessed to be 15% and in the Southwestern TVD 20% with little significant change predicted. For the Strategic reserve in 1984 it was 30% modern but stil containing significant numbers of light PT 76 and Heavy JS series vehicles as well as T55/62, this would adjust to 50% by 1990.



Victor Suverov discussed a Unified Warsaw Pact command, providing 3 Fronts in the first echelon, 2 in Germany and 1 in Chezceslovakia 1 in the second echelon in Poland and a Group of Tank Armies in the third centred on the Soviet Military Districts of the Western TVD.  He also indicated that to bring GSFG up to strength to form 2 Fronts three divisions, 1 TD and 2 MRD, would have to be moved from Beylorus.

A bold assessment of this data might conclude that one of the Fronts in Germany was T64 equipped the other T80 equipped with the NGSF also using T80, whilst the Front centred on the CGSF used T72.  Units from the Soviet MDs that were part of the Western TVD that would be sent to reinforce GSFG would be equipped with either T80 or T64 as requiered and that the remainder of the third echelon would be T72 equipped. The confusion that is seen in the equipment listings being the amount of time it took to achieve and any rationalisation that occurred around training stocks and shifting equipment around as it was replaced. 



The changes to specific tank designs over the period are outlined below, I've mostly concentrated on the changes that make a war-games difference, quite extensive descriptions of the totality of change can be found in the references and links.

T 62

The main production run for the T62 took place between 1963 - 1973, in 1972 it was updated to allow a Dshk heavy machine gun to be fitted to the loaders hatch which was not retrofitted to older variants and provided with an APFSDS round. 



in 1975 a KTD 1 laser was fitted in armoured box over main gun improving HEAT and HE Frag accuracy over 1000 m.  

Between 1980 -1985 700+ T 62 were upgraded to the T62M,  this provided improved armour with laminate appliqué packages for hull and turret increasing protection to levels found on the T72A/64. In addition Smoke Grenade Discharger units were added and a series of accuracy improvements included upgrades to; the laser range finder,  fire control system, gun Stabilisation and a thermal sleeve. Significantly the Sheksna tube launched missile with a range of 4km was fielded.  Small numbers of T62 MV were identified with Kontakt 1 but these were not deployed in any numbers. I would be inclined to speculate that the fact the capability existed implied it could have been rolled out for a major conflict.













T 64



Consistent data on the T64 seems quite hard to find. It was deployed to the western group of forces from 1976. In 1981 fielding of  the T64B upgrade commenced which included a tube launched missile system, the 9K112 kobra or AT8 Songster with a 4km range.  In addition an improved fire control system and laser range finder were also provided. 



By 1984 vehicles with appliqué armour packs were being observed together with the T 64 BV fielding the Kontakt 1 explosive reactive armour. Other than wikipedia I can find no reference of a BM version with Kontakt 5 which seems inconsistent with the evolution paths of the T 80 and T 72 and no reference of an upgrade to the AT 11 Snipper missile system.


The T72 commenced it's initial production run in 1974 and in 1978 was upgraded to the T72A this initially provided improvements to the armour and added a laser range finder. 



In 1980 12 Smoke Grenade Dischargers were added to the front of the vehicle and in 1981 anti radiation cladding was added to the turret along with an extra stowage box, these last set of changes being largely cosmetic as far as the wargamer is concerned.  The T-72 AV with ERA could have been deployed from 1984 but was not identified until 1987/1988.




In 1985 the T 72 B appeared with enhanced laminate appliqué armour giving it protection levels better than the T80B.  The upgrade included a variety of other modifications that included, new road wheels with 6 indents rather than 8, a new engine to accommodate the increase in weight.  The smoke grenade dischargers initially mounted on the front were shifted to the side to accommodate the Kontakt 1 ERA units. 


This implies the ERA units were available before they were positivly identified being deployed on T72Bs, In 1987/88.  in 1988/89 the T72B was upgraded to allow the T72 to fire the AT11 Snipper missile, vehicles not upgraded were designated T72B1.  Subsequent to the collapse of the Soviet Union firing tests conducted in the US identified that the T 72B would have been a difficult beast to kill.  



From around this time it would appear that tanks were issued from the factory in the three colour, green sand and black camouflage scheme.  In 1990 the Soviets started to deploy the T72BM which used the Kontakt 5 ERA packs this vehicle is effectively what is now termed the T 90, having been re christened following the Chechen conflict.




The initial production run of 200 vehicles between 1976 - 1978 had no laser range finder and no missile capability the 1981 upgrade to the T80B saw the laser range finder added and the capability to fire the AT8 Songster. in addition the Soviets commenced deploying the vehicle to GSFG.  



Production of the T 80BV commenced in 1985 with deployed vehicles being identified a few years later equipped with Kontakt 1.  It is not clear whether in the event of war many of the T80Bs would have been seen sporting ERA.  



In 1987 the T 80U with Kontakt 5 and the AT11 Sniper was deployed, with the T80UD following in 1991 with a diesel engine. Similar to the T 72s they started to be issued direct from the factory in the Sand Green and Black scheemes in the late 1980s.



I have currently divided the late cold war period 1980 - 1993 into three periods around which I will probably build war-games forces, these being 1983-85, 1988-90 and 1991- 1993

1983 - 1985, breakdown by type 50% T62 50% T64/72/80 (older tanks primarily in formations not converted to T64, 1st Guards Tank and 8th Guards Armies, these would be T62/80 as conversion occurred, therefore T54/55 unlikely to be found in Soviet units in forward elements in Western TVD)

GSFG,  T62 and T62M, T64B or T64BV, T 80B
CGSF, T62, T72A
NGSF, T62

1988 - 1991 25% T62 75% T64/72/80 (older tanks in training stock and independent tank battalions, my assessment would be T62 only)

GSFG T62, T62M, T64B, T64BV, T80B and BV
CGSF T62, T62M, T72A T72AV, T72B and B1 with or without ERA

1991 - 1993 100% T64/72/80

GSFG T64B, T 64BV, T80B and BV, T80U
CGSF  T72A, T72AV, T72B and B1 with or without ERA, T72BM



Whilst the analysis has been interesting the constitution of my MRR tank battalion will be somewhat simpler, for:
  • 1980 - 1985 I'll be using T72As currently these are earlies with Smoke Grenade Dischargers, I may upgrade a few to be lates withe the extra stowage bins.  having researched this I'm considering a T62M option as well although I strongly suspect these were modified primarily for Afghanistan.
  • 1988 - 1990 I'll use T72B and B1s with ERA, with an option to use the T72As if I want to get slaughtered
  • 1991 - 1993 I'll use either T72Bs and T72 B1s with ERA or T72 BM
Bearing in mind that the fronts and armies would have been composed of non Soviet and Soviet Warsaw Pact forces all under Soviet Command at Front and Army level then you can almost field anything at any time.  I hope to run through other vehicles and some of the conundrums raised by unified Warsaw Pact command in a later post.

The Next Post in this series deals with the allocation and task organisation of engineer resources

References:

Inside the Soviet Army, Victor Suverov
Tank War Central Front, Osprey
T80 Standard Tank, Osprey
T72 Main Battle Tank 1974-1993, Osprey
T62 Main Battle Tank 1965-2005, Osprey
Weapons and Tactics of The Soviet Army, Isbey
T64 walk around, variety of variants
T72 walk around, variety of variants
T80 walk around, variety of variants
ORBAT- 1980's MRR and TRR, Part 1Part 3, Part 4




Saturday, 25 February 2012

Review - Model 1/72, S&S 2S1 Model



The 2S1 entered Soviet service in 1971. It initially replaced towed artillery batteries in tank divisions, tank regiments and BMP equipped motor rifle regiments. By the 1980s regimental batteries were being increased in size to battalions and by the late 80s BTR regiments in GSFG were recieving them. The vehicle mounts a 122mm D30 Gun and swims with little preparation and together with the D30 towed gun provided the mainstay of regimental artillery.


These vehicles are the main equipments in my Motor Rifle Regiment's Regimental Artillery Group covered here. As with all things Soviet it has had a long life and is still in service globally with many nations, so another of those very flexible pieces.





Fabbri make a ready assembled version, Ace and Armo both make more intricate versions. The ACE model is difficult as the instructions are unclear around the track assembly. This review focuses on the S&S model which if you are into volume production is a good bet, being the easiest to obtain and construct, both the others are aimed more at the modelling market than the war gaming.



The model is cast in resin, the hulls and turrets of the eight versions I have recieved over the last three years have been clean and free of bubbles, the model requiers little preparation before assembly. The barrel is cast in white metal and on the latest versions recieved from Shaun is flash free, assembly is straight forward.


The vehicle is instantly recognisable as a 2S1 with the shape size and major features being clearly represented. The only niggle to my mind being that the angle of the cut away on the forward left hull corner is probably a little sharp. I have not attempted to add any extra detail to my vehicles and could find little evidence of the vehicles in use with any significant stowage.

The obvious conversion job is the UR-77 Meteorit, an explosive hose mine clearance system. the options are to either scratch build the turret or to kit bash using the turret supplied with the ACE kit avoiding the difficult hull construction.


The other is the RKhM "Kashalot", but as this was built on a shortened chasis, conversion of the resin hull might not be the best way forward.






I have painted 2S1 in Vajello Russian Green, weathered using washes of vajello Khaki and khaki grey. The decals are from a variety of ace or ICM kits. TL Modelblaus Soviet set might also be useful particularly if you wish to represent Naval Infantry versions.

Other 2S1 resources on the web that you might find useful are:

Sigga, Modelling madness
Ace, KG Wings
ACE 2S1, on the way, kit review
Armo 2S1, on the way, kit review
2S1 Walk Around, Prime Portal
UR-77 Walk Around, Prime Portal
UR-77 missing lynx, Braille scale forum thread